Bridgford Foods Corp | Investor Service

2003 Annual Report

Cash equivalents

The Company considers all investments with original maturities of three months or less to be cash equivalents. Cash equivalents include money market funds and treasury bills of $1,180 at November 3, 2006 and $5,855 at October 28, 2005.

Restatement / Trading Securities

At November 3, 2006 and October 28, 2005, the Company held $12,200 and $4,500, respectively, of auction rate securities, which are now shown as a separately stated current asset in the accompanying financial statements. Previously, auction rate securities were part of cash and cash equivalents and are now classified as trading securities in the consolidated balance sheet. Auction rate securities are variable-rate bonds tied to short-term interest rates with maturities on the face of the securities in excess of 90 days. The Company's investments in these auction rate securities are accounted for under SFAS 115, Accounting for Certain Investments in Debt and Equity Securities. The securities are recorded at cost, which approximates fair market value because of their variable interest rates, which typically reset every 7 to 35 days. Despite the long-term nature of their stated contractual maturities, the Company has the intent and ability to quickly liquidate these securities; therefore, the Company has no cumulative gross unrealized holding gains or losses, or gross unrealized gains or losses from these investments. All income generated from these investments was recorded as interest income.

At November 3, 2006 and October 28, 2005, the Company held $12,200 and $4,500, respectively, of auction rate securities, which are now shown as a separately stated current asset in the accompanying financial statements. The consolidated balance sheets as of November 3, 2006 and October 28, 2005, have been restated to move auction rate securities out of cash and cash equivalents to trading securities.

The restated sections of the consolidated balance sheet can be summarized as follows:

 

 

2006

2005

Original:    
 

Cash and cash equivalents

$13,380

$10,355

 

Trading securities

       
As restated:    
  Cash and cash equivalents 1,180 5,855
  Trading securities 12,200 4,500

The consolidated statements of cash flow for years ended November 3, 2006 and October 28, 2005 have been restated to give effect of auction rate securities activity classified as trading securities.

The restated sections of the consolidated statements of cash flows can be summarized as follows:

 

 

2006

2005

Original:    
 

Net cashprovided by operating activities

$4,874

$4,515

       
As restated:    
  Net cash (used) provided by operating activities (2,826) 15

 

Inventories

Inventories are stated at the lower of cost (determined on a first-in, first-out basis) or market.

Property, plant and equipment

Property, plant and equipment are carried at cost less accumulated depreciation. Major renewals and betterments are charged to the asset accounts while the cost of maintenance and repairs is charged to expense as incurred. When assets are sold or otherwise disposed of, the cost and accumulated depreciation are removed from the respective accounts and the resulting gain or loss is credited or charged to income. Depreciation is computed on a straight-line basis over 10 to 20 years for buildings and improvements, 5 to 10 years for machinery and equipment and 3 to 5 years for transportation equipment.

Income taxes

Deferred taxes are provided for items whose financial and tax bases differ. A valuation allowance is provided against deferred tax assets when it is expected that it is more likely than not that the related asset will not be fully realized.

The Company provides tax reserves for federal, state, local and international exposures relating to audit results, tax planning initiatives and compliance responsibilities. The development of these reserves requires judgments about tax issues, potential outcomes and timing, and is a subjective estimate. Although the outcome of these tax audits is uncertain, in management’s opinion adequate provisions for income taxes have been made for potential liabilities emanating from these reviews. If actual outcomes differ materially from these estimates, they could have a material impact on our results of operations.

In June 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Interpretation No. 48, “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes, an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109” (“FIN 48”). This Statement addresses uncertainty in tax positions recognized in a company’s financial statements and stipulates a recognition threshold and measurement of a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. FIN 48 will apply to the Company’s fiscal year beginning November 3, 2007, with earlier adoption permitted. The Company does not expect this interpretation will have a material impact on the Company’s results of operations or financial position.

Stock-based compensation

In December 2004, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 123R, “Share-Based Payment”. SFAS No. 123R requires public companies to measure and recognize compensation expense for all share-based payments to employees, including grants of employee stock options, in the financial statements based on the fair value at the date of the grant. The Statement also clarifies and expands SFAS No. 123’s guidance in several areas, including measuring fair value, classifying an award as equity or as a liability, and attributing compensation cost to reporting periods. SFAS No. 123R became effective for the Company’s fiscal year ending November 3, 2006. The Company has not issued, awarded, granted or entered into any stock-based payment agreements since April 29, 1999. The modified prospective adoption of SFAS No. 123R did not have any impact on the Company’s financial condition or results of operations for fiscal year ended November 3, 2006.

Prior to adoption of SFAS No. 123R, the Company adopted SFAS No. 123 ‘“Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation” which allowed the Company to apply the provisions of Accounting Principles Board (“APB”) Opinion No. 25, “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees,” and related interpretations in accounting for stock-based compensation and, therefore, no compensation expense was recognized for its fixed stock option plans as options are generally granted at fair market value based upon the closing price on the date immediately preceding the grant date. On December 31, 2002 the FASB issued SFAS No. 148, “Accounting for Stock Based Compensation- Transition and Disclosure”, which amended SFAS No. 123. SFAS No. 148 requires more prominent and frequent disclosures about the effects of stock-based compensation. Accordingly, if compensation expense for the Company’s stock options had been recognized, based upon the fair value of awards granted, there would have been no impact on the Company’s net income and earnings per share for fiscal year ended November 3, 2006.