Bridgford Foods Corp | Investor Service


(page 4)



MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Certain statements under “Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and elsewhere in this report constitute “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Securities Act of 1933 and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Such forward looking statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties, and other factors which may cause the actual results, performance, or achievements of Bridgford Foods Corporation to be materially different from any future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by such forward looking statements. Such factors include, among others, the following; general economic and business conditions; the impact of competitive products and pricing; success of operating initiatives; development and operating costs; advertising and promotional efforts; adverse publicity; acceptance of new product offerings; consumer trial and frequency; changes in business strategy or development plans; availability, terms and deployment of capital; availability of qualified personnel; commodity, labor, and employee benefit costs; changes in, or failure to comply with, government regulations; weather conditions; construction schedules; and other factors referenced in this report.

The Company's operating results are heavily dependent upon the prices paid for raw materials. The marketing of the Company's value-added products does not lend itself to instantaneous changes in selling prices. Changes in selling prices are relatively infrequent and do not compare with the volatility of commodity markets. The impact of inflation on the Company's financial position and results of operations has not been significant during the last three years.

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (in thousands)

2003 compared to 2002

Sales in fiscal 2003 declined $2,951 (2.1%) when compared to the prior year. Sales in the Company's frozen food division declined 6.9%, as a result of continued weak demand and aggressive competition. Sales in the Company's direct store delivery non-refrigerated meat snack division increased 1.5%, primarily as a result of higher unit volumes. Sales in the Company's direct store delivery Deli division also declined 3.4% due lower unit volumes. The gross margin remained relatively consistent with the prior year at 36.7%. Increased ingredient costs during the year were offset by lower unit overhead due to improved volume on items processed by the company. Overall, net selling prices remained relatively consistent with the prior fiscal year.

Selling, general and administrative expenses decreased $487 (1.1%). A reduction in the provision for losses on accounts receivable from fiscal years 2002 to 2003 contributed to this decrease. Rising costs for employee healthcare, workers' compensation, property and liability insurance, transportation costs, product displays and pension expense mitigated the effect of the reduction in the loss provision on accounts receivable.

The Company benefited from an effective income tax rate of 38% in 2003 compared to 49.9% in 2002. The rate in the prior year was abnormally high due to the revaluation of state deferred tax assets.

2002 compared to 2001

Sales in fiscal 2002 declined $13,262 (8.7%) when compared to the prior year. All segments of the Company's business were adversely affected by the recession. Sales in the Company's frozen food division declined 7.3%, as a result of continued weak demand and aggressive competition. Sales in the Company's direct store delivery non-refrigerated meat snack division declined 10.8%, primarily as a result of the weak economy and the bankruptcy of a significant customer. Sales in the Company's direct store delivery Deli division also declined 5.9% due to similar factors already noted above. The gross margin remained relatively consistent with the prior year at 36.5%. Higher unit costs resulting from lower production volumes were offset by more favorable pork commodity prices. Flour prices increased during the year offsetting lower pork commodity prices.

Selling, general and administrative expenses increased $2,637 (6.3%). The provision for losses on accounts receivable was increased by $3,750 due to the bankruptcy of a significant customer and collectibility issues related to other significant accounts. In addition, the Company expensed approximately $658 in non-recurring costs associated with the implementation of the Company's new information systems during the fiscal year. After considering these factors, selling, general and administrative expenses decreased 4.3% due to lower sales offset by other factors adversely affecting this category including rising costs for employee healthcare, worker's compensation, property and liability insurance, transportation costs and pension expense. The Company expects to continue the growth and modernization of facilities and equipment used in the business.

Income before taxes declined 77.5% as a result of the loss of gross margin in the amount of $4,834 and the significant factors noted above. The effective tax rate increased to 49.9%, primarily as the result of the revaluation of deferred tax assets due to a lower than expected state tax rate.

2001 compared to 2000

Sales in fiscal year 2001 (52 weeks) remained essentially flat when compared to sales of the prior year (53 weeks). Average weekly sales increased approximately 2% in fiscal 2001 compared to the prior 53-week year. The sales increase is primarily a result of increased selling prices and changes in product mix.

Cost of products sold remained essentially flat when compared to the prior year. The gross margin was approximately 37% in 2001 and 2000. Commodity costs over the course of the 2001 fiscal year were generally comparable to fiscal year 2000.

Selling, general and administrative expenses increased $2,335 (5.9%) when compared to the prior 53-week year. Higher costs related to advertising and product promotions, fuel and insurance were the primary contributors to these increases. Interest income also declined significantly which adversely impacted these costs.

The Company's capital expansion projects remained at levels consistent with the prior year. The effective tax rate remained consistent with the prior year at 38%.

(page 5)


 
2003 Annual Report: 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13